Online

Comprehensive traffic data for over 10,000 sites, alongside usage, demographic breakdowns and advertising revenue reports. Find out more.

Can social TV survive without appointment TV?

21 Feb 2012 |  Jeremy Toeman 
Jeremy Toeman

So the Grammy's unsurprisingly (I will explain why I say it that way in a moment) set all sorts of records for social TV. Just like the Superbowl did a few weeks ago. I call this a big yawner, but first, some definitions:

  • Appointment TV: a TV show where the majority of the audience is watching live. The five primary examples are reality shows (American Idol, Amazing Race, etc), news (CNN), sports (mostly hockey), events (Oscars, Royal Weddings etc), and "big episodes" of scripted television (Lost Series finale, Game Of Thrones season 2 premiere etc).
  • Catch-up TV: everything that doesn't fit into appointment TV above. Literally. Every "typical" episode of every "typical" show is in the catch-up category, which means there is no particular driver for someone to watch it anywhere near to real-time. This is why I'm still on Weeds season 5, Entourage season 6 etc, and will catch up on things like Breaking Bad, Game of Thrones and others whenever I find the desire.
  • Social TV: let's do this SAT-style. Social TV : TV :: Social Media : Web. In other words, it's a nebulous mess of "stuff you use - things like Facebook and Twitter - to do while watching TV". It includes hashtags, check-ins, second screen, likes, and is a big jumbly undefined thing. And I have no problem with that.

So why do I say things like "unsurprisingly" and "yawner"? Because this is a burgeoning activity. We are at the very earliest stage of people using second screens whilst (yup, whilst) watching TV. I myself tweeted a couple of times during the Superbowl (really during the ads):

Jeremy's tweet

This is an infinite increase over last year's SuperBowl. I didn't watch the Grammy's, but had I, I likely would've tweeted. And this isn't just about me, it's a pretty universal trend. Why? Because Twitter, the platform we are using to measure social TV as a concept, is still growing. So anything measuring a growing service with growing use and calling the outcome "record-setting" is really just fulfilling an exercise in redundancy. Every new instance of appointment TV tweeting will outpace all previous instances, until Twitter stops growing.

But really, that's all just a sidepoint. My issue, concern, and question, is whether or not there's any value whatsoever in any of this for catch-up TV. Do I care about tweets someone sent during an episode of House from last year? Or last week? Or even 10 minutes ago? I don't, and I don't understand why someone else would either. Nor do I care about what someone is watching right now unless I too can (and should) watch the same thing, at the same time. Heck, I hate seeing the promos to text in my vote (to Top Chef, my guilty pleasure show) when I'm seeing an episode four months after it aired.

I don't see a solution to this conundrum. To be clear, I'm not questioning will social media impact TV behaviours - that will certainly happen. Further, as evidence is mounting that catch-up TV is growing steadily and will inevitably outpace real-time/appointment TV, I see the window somewhat shrinking for what's currently called "social TV". But that shouldn't really surprise anyone, as it's such an early stage in the evolution of TV. And if you think about it in evolutionary terms, TV is just learning about making fire now, and the wheel is probably a few years away...

Read the full article here.

Latest Online News

As Facebook records second quarter revenues of $2.91bn - with its once-floundering mobile business now accounting for 62% of advertising revenues - Jason Mander, head of trends atGlobalWebIndex, analyses the results.
AOL is to place all of its reserved online inventory into its own demand side platform - automating the entire ad trading process.
With a 300 year print legacy, Johnston Press is undergoing an enormous cultural change as it embraces everything digital has to offer. Here, the publisher's CMO, Lucy Sinclair, shares what they have learned.
From audit periods ending July 2014, a full breakdown between print and digital copies will be shown for all regional titles, as well as a statement of the total average number of print and digital edition bundles.
The new 'Buy' call-to-action button will allow desktop and mobile users to purchase a product directly from a business without leaving Facebook.
June was a successful month for online newsbrands, with all but one platform reporting either good or strong gains.
Online ad fraud is getting smarter, bots are evolving to mimic humans and agencies are bidding for fake and unsafe ad space. So why is the industry burying its head in the sand? asks Marco Ricci, CEO of Adloox.
Newspaper publishers have served notice on the National Readership Survey as they seek a contemporary audience measurement system. Here, the NRS's newly appointed CEO, Simon Redican, tells us what the future needs to look like.
The new site has been described as a mix of the best of the Independent and its sister title the i and combines new editorial formats including quizzes, voting, user curation and interactive graphics and maps.
Younger viewers of online video and TV find targeted ads more intrusive than older viewers do, according to STRATA.

More Latest Online News available to subscribers