Online

Comprehensive traffic data for over 10,000 sites, alongside usage, demographic breakdowns and advertising revenue reports. Find out more.

Can social TV survive without appointment TV?

21 Feb 2012 |  Jeremy Toeman 
Jeremy Toeman

So the Grammy's unsurprisingly (I will explain why I say it that way in a moment) set all sorts of records for social TV. Just like the Superbowl did a few weeks ago. I call this a big yawner, but first, some definitions:

  • Appointment TV: a TV show where the majority of the audience is watching live. The five primary examples are reality shows (American Idol, Amazing Race, etc), news (CNN), sports (mostly hockey), events (Oscars, Royal Weddings etc), and "big episodes" of scripted television (Lost Series finale, Game Of Thrones season 2 premiere etc).
  • Catch-up TV: everything that doesn't fit into appointment TV above. Literally. Every "typical" episode of every "typical" show is in the catch-up category, which means there is no particular driver for someone to watch it anywhere near to real-time. This is why I'm still on Weeds season 5, Entourage season 6 etc, and will catch up on things like Breaking Bad, Game of Thrones and others whenever I find the desire.
  • Social TV: let's do this SAT-style. Social TV : TV :: Social Media : Web. In other words, it's a nebulous mess of "stuff you use - things like Facebook and Twitter - to do while watching TV". It includes hashtags, check-ins, second screen, likes, and is a big jumbly undefined thing. And I have no problem with that.

So why do I say things like "unsurprisingly" and "yawner"? Because this is a burgeoning activity. We are at the very earliest stage of people using second screens whilst (yup, whilst) watching TV. I myself tweeted a couple of times during the Superbowl (really during the ads):

Jeremy's tweet

This is an infinite increase over last year's SuperBowl. I didn't watch the Grammy's, but had I, I likely would've tweeted. And this isn't just about me, it's a pretty universal trend. Why? Because Twitter, the platform we are using to measure social TV as a concept, is still growing. So anything measuring a growing service with growing use and calling the outcome "record-setting" is really just fulfilling an exercise in redundancy. Every new instance of appointment TV tweeting will outpace all previous instances, until Twitter stops growing.

But really, that's all just a sidepoint. My issue, concern, and question, is whether or not there's any value whatsoever in any of this for catch-up TV. Do I care about tweets someone sent during an episode of House from last year? Or last week? Or even 10 minutes ago? I don't, and I don't understand why someone else would either. Nor do I care about what someone is watching right now unless I too can (and should) watch the same thing, at the same time. Heck, I hate seeing the promos to text in my vote (to Top Chef, my guilty pleasure show) when I'm seeing an episode four months after it aired.

I don't see a solution to this conundrum. To be clear, I'm not questioning will social media impact TV behaviours - that will certainly happen. Further, as evidence is mounting that catch-up TV is growing steadily and will inevitably outpace real-time/appointment TV, I see the window somewhat shrinking for what's currently called "social TV". But that shouldn't really surprise anyone, as it's such an early stage in the evolution of TV. And if you think about it in evolutionary terms, TV is just learning about making fire now, and the wheel is probably a few years away...

Read the full article here.

Latest Online News

AppNexus, the real-time online ad platform, is to acquire Xaxis' ad-serving technology as part of a strategic deal to boost WPP's programmatic offering, it has been announced.
Have we got millennials all wrong? Initiative's international research director, Hanna Chalmers, showcases the findings of a new study that suggests young people are not all selfie-obsessed narcissists.
Wayne Blodwell joins the agency from Group M's buying company, Xaxis, where he developed programmatic strategies for direct response and brand advertisers across the MediaCom portfolio.
There was a mixed bag of a results online newsbrands in August, with the biggest losses outweighing the gains.
For the very first time the National Readership Survey is able to show the reach of magazine brands across not only print and PC, but also mobile and tablet.
In an industry first, the NRS is now able to report newsbrand readership figures with the addition of mobile and tablet data to print and PC.
This week Dominic Mills questioned why digital agencies fail to make it on to the short-list for the IPA's Effectiveness Awards. Here, DigitasLBi's Fern Miller explains the reluctance to throw their hat into the ring.
It might only now be a hot topic, but online ad fraud has been around for years, writes Infectious Media's Dan de Sybel. So why has it not been eradicated?
The Financial Times has today launched a new-look newspaper designed for an age in which readers consume content across a variety of different platforms.
Weve, the joint venture between EE, O2 and Vodafone, has reportedly scaled back plans for a contactless payment app because the partners cannot agree on how to progress.

More Latest Online News available to subscribers