Viewing data by channel and by programme, impacts, revenue and universes plus TV and sport sponsorship information. Find out more.

Can social TV survive without appointment TV?

21 Feb 2012 |  Jeremy Toeman 
Jeremy Toeman

So the Grammy's unsurprisingly (I will explain why I say it that way in a moment) set all sorts of records for social TV. Just like the Superbowl did a few weeks ago. I call this a big yawner, but first, some definitions:

  • Appointment TV: a TV show where the majority of the audience is watching live. The five primary examples are reality shows (American Idol, Amazing Race, etc), news (CNN), sports (mostly hockey), events (Oscars, Royal Weddings etc), and "big episodes" of scripted television (Lost Series finale, Game Of Thrones season 2 premiere etc).
  • Catch-up TV: everything that doesn't fit into appointment TV above. Literally. Every "typical" episode of every "typical" show is in the catch-up category, which means there is no particular driver for someone to watch it anywhere near to real-time. This is why I'm still on Weeds season 5, Entourage season 6 etc, and will catch up on things like Breaking Bad, Game of Thrones and others whenever I find the desire.
  • Social TV: let's do this SAT-style. Social TV : TV :: Social Media : Web. In other words, it's a nebulous mess of "stuff you use - things like Facebook and Twitter - to do while watching TV". It includes hashtags, check-ins, second screen, likes, and is a big jumbly undefined thing. And I have no problem with that.

So why do I say things like "unsurprisingly" and "yawner"? Because this is a burgeoning activity. We are at the very earliest stage of people using second screens whilst (yup, whilst) watching TV. I myself tweeted a couple of times during the Superbowl (really during the ads):

Jeremy's tweet

This is an infinite increase over last year's SuperBowl. I didn't watch the Grammy's, but had I, I likely would've tweeted. And this isn't just about me, it's a pretty universal trend. Why? Because Twitter, the platform we are using to measure social TV as a concept, is still growing. So anything measuring a growing service with growing use and calling the outcome "record-setting" is really just fulfilling an exercise in redundancy. Every new instance of appointment TV tweeting will outpace all previous instances, until Twitter stops growing.

But really, that's all just a sidepoint. My issue, concern, and question, is whether or not there's any value whatsoever in any of this for catch-up TV. Do I care about tweets someone sent during an episode of House from last year? Or last week? Or even 10 minutes ago? I don't, and I don't understand why someone else would either. Nor do I care about what someone is watching right now unless I too can (and should) watch the same thing, at the same time. Heck, I hate seeing the promos to text in my vote (to Top Chef, my guilty pleasure show) when I'm seeing an episode four months after it aired.

I don't see a solution to this conundrum. To be clear, I'm not questioning will social media impact TV behaviours - that will certainly happen. Further, as evidence is mounting that catch-up TV is growing steadily and will inevitably outpace real-time/appointment TV, I see the window somewhat shrinking for what's currently called "social TV". But that shouldn't really surprise anyone, as it's such an early stage in the evolution of TV. And if you think about it in evolutionary terms, TV is just learning about making fire now, and the wheel is probably a few years away...

Read the full article here.

Latest Television News

The investment, which will come from Channel 4's £20 million Growth Fund, will see the publicly-owned broadcaster take undisclosed minority stakes of up to 25% in four companies.
Last night Channel 4 took viewers on a precarious airborne journey through some of Indonesia's most isolated communities in the broadcaster's latest 'quirky' work place documentary, Worst Place to Be a Pilot (9pm).
Only three short days after Channel 5 released the survivors from the Big Brother 2014 compound the broadcaster rounded up another 14 souls...
Channel 4 was still busy picking apart the carcass of that bloke from the car park at 9pm, as Richard III: The New Evidence (9pm) discovered that the 15th century was generally a hotbed of good times.
There were mixed results for commercial television channels in July, with only ITV Breakfast reporting any significant gains.
Last night's instalment gave viewers one of those episodes where the researchers struck gold, slowly revealing a dramatic and sorrowful tale of a family torn about by circumstance and tragedy.
The second episode of freshly relocated The Great British Bake Off (8pm) continued to attract an impressive prime time audience, even if viewers were down slightly on last week's BBC One début.
The 2014 World Cup continued to dominate the top programmes list this month, alongside Wimbledon and the Commonwealth Games.
RTL's recent acquisition of a majority stake in SpotXchange has given Decipher's Nigel Walley a nervous sense of déjà vu, reminding him of a previous broadcaster's dramatic foray into emerging digital media...
A little over a year since Lord Hall took charge of the BBC, how should we judge his performance? Raymond Snoddy gets out his red pen and examines the evidence.

More Latest Television News available to subscribers